Epidemiology and associated factors for CrossFit-related musculoskeletal injuries: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: CrossFit® is usually composed of high intensity workout routines and is executed quickly, repetitively and with limited rest time. Previous studies have identified a high prevalence of injuries in CrossFit®. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CrossFit-related musculoskeletal injuries and to identify potential associated factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 413 CrossFitters. Participants completed a questionnaire containing personal data, training characteristics and injury history in the last 12 months. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. RESULTS: The prevalence of CrossFit-related musculoskeletal injuries was 24.0%; and the injury rate was of 0.80 injuries per 1,000 hours of exposure. The regions of the body most affected were the lumbar spine (33.3%), shoulders (31.3%) and knees (14.1%). The majority of CrossFitters participated in competitions (74.6%), had more than 12 months of experience in CrossFit® (62.7%), and trained up to 90 minutes a day (82.3%) for more than 4 days a week (76.8%). The variables that showed a significant association with CrossFit®-related musculoskeletal injuries were weekly training frequency (OR=2.25; 95% CI: 1.13-4.48) and regular physiotherapeutic care (OR=1.85; 95% CI: 1.11-3.07). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of musculoskeletal injury was 24.0%, and the most affected regions of the body were the lumbar spine, shoulders and knees. Training more than four days a week and do not receive regular physiotherapeutic care were associated with CrossFit-related musculoskeletal injuries.

Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reproducibility of the Downing Test for Sacroiliac Joint Evaluation of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility of the Downing test in sacroiliac joint evaluation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: A reliability study was conducted with a test-retest design in 54 college students of both sexes. To assess the intraexaminer reproducibility, each participant was evaluated twice by the same examiner with a 7-day interval, and to assess the interexaminer reproducibility, each participant was evaluated by 2 examiners. RESULTS: Of the 54 participants included in the study, 18 (33.3%) were asymptomatic and 36 (66.7%) were symptomatic; a total of 108 sacroiliac joints were evaluated. Sacroiliac joint diagnosis based on the Downing test presented low intraexaminer reproducibility in all participants (κ = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.22), in asymptomatic individuals (κ = 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-0.34), and in symptomatic individuals (κ = 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.39). The interexaminer reproducibility also was low in all participants (κ = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.27), in asymptomatic individuals (κ = 0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.37), and in symptomatic individuals (κ = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.27). The standard error of the measurement values were not lower than smallest detectable change values considering a CI of 95% for all participants. CONCLUSION: For this group of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants, the reproducibility of the Downing test was poor. The clinical utility of this test used in isolation is not supported by the present study.